The learning outcomes that are assessed by this coursework are: - Undertake research into a relevant topic area and present the work to a professional standard.
- Critically analyse the UK approach in your chosen research topic against a differing international approach.
Tasks to be undertaken: You are required to evaluate the PRINCE2 project management methodology. Write a report and explain its purpose, characteristics, suitable application and popularity. Outline at least one area of how PRINCE2 addresses key project management issues such as Risk, Configuration Management, Quality and Plans etc. You must also compare the approach taken in PRINCE2 with another internationally recognized management framework (e.g. Agile), critically analyzing the approaches taken in both to identify potential strengths and weaknesses.
The report must be produced to a professional manner. Your work must be typed on a single sided A4 paper with pages numbered. You must choose a legible font and use 1.5 or double line spacing. Errors in spelling and grammar will be penalised. Please use UK spellings throughout. Please note that formatting and presentation of the documentation will be taken into account when marking.
Deliverables to be submitted for assessment:
You are required to submit a
REPORTas outlined above.
CRITERIA: Presentation, clarity, grammar, reference notation:
Clear logical structure, developing a theme with creative suggestions. References consistent and in preferred form. A pleasure to read.
Evidence of useful research supporting your work:
Choice of material shows balance, evidence of wide reading, and a willingness to engage with complex data or narrative.
Understanding of PRINCE2 methodology and identification of key project management areas:
Excellent understanding of PRINCE2. Professional report. Clearly identifies the key areas of importance and provides clear sections linked to examples and key project management area. Includes case study.
Comparison with other Project Management methodology:
Authoritative and professional statement of key issues, recommendations and strong critical evaluation of each of these.
Information integrity: Work has been completed integrated forming a well linked and coherent report.
